Word is out that Secretary of Defense James Mattis, upon the recommendation of Secretary of the Army Mark Esper, could shut down the U.S. Army War College’s Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Institute (PKSOI), a unique American asset that has enjoyed bipartisan and international support for decades.
For a miniscule saving — the cost of two or three Tomahawk missiles — this would be a great loss for the country and for the world.
The mission of PKSOI is to provide training and information to military and civilian personnel. In this age of asymmetric warfare, the armed forces play an essential role in preventing the outbreak of armed conflict, preventing the escalation of violence when it does break out, and stabilizing post conflict situations. The Army has wisely used PKSOI to train personnel from an extensive practical knowledge base of best practices, saving lives and treasure in the process.
Every year, governments from all over the world send men and women to the U.S. Army War College in Carlisle for this training, which is vital and wide ranging, including areas such as peace and security, mass atrocity response, village stability operations, stability policing and police reform, anti-terrorism, reconstruction planning, gender-based violence, disaster relief, internally displaced persons and demobilization disarmament and reintegration.
Some argue that these problems are too complex to be addressed by warfighters, but in reality, warfighters are often the only ones with the resources and knowledge to be able to address a growing list of humanitarian disasters. It’s more than having boots on the ground with sufficient fire power. Those professionals must have the deep, practical knowledge required in complex conflict and post-conflict situations.
PKSOI is a unique resource for U.S. armed forces and our allies. It is also a valued partner of civilian institutions such as the State Department and USAID. It makes an important contribution toward limiting violence and preserving world peace.
Reports indicate Esper wants to shut down PKSOI in part because he objects to the word “peacekeeping.” Some speculate the closure is a cost-saving measure, however miniscule to the DoD’s $700 billion budget. Still other reports suggest that this recommendation is a result of a desire to shift greater responsibility for peacekeeping to aid organizations.
You have free articles remaining.
Based on my international experiences, I can say unequivocally that aid organizations are not equipped with strong peacekeeping, logistics and the rapid response capabilities needed in these emergency and conflict situations.
I have seen the results of what happens when highly trained professionals are not available in a humanitarian crisis. I was president of the American University in Nigeria (AUN) for seven years in the midst of the Boko Haram insurgency. We were confronted with an influx of 300,000 refugees fleeing violence to the north. No one in the local and state government and no one in the local armed forces was prepared to respond effectively.
Security forces did not have the well-rounded competencies needed to play the role required of them, and national leaders purposely ignored the threat. AUN, along with the Adamawa Peace Initiative, a group of religious and community leaders, stepped up and filled the void by feeding the refugees, helping farmers return to their land, and developing programs that helped Muslims and Christians work together toward peace. When aid agencies finally arrived on the scene, they refused to work with AUN and community leaders, and often took misguided action or duplicated efforts.
Dickinson College has worked with PKSOI for nearly a decade. Since my arrival at Dickinson last year, I have come to admire the rigor and commitment of the U.S. Army War College, its professionalism and its dedication to peacekeeping and to the creation of a less violent and more humane world.
The peacekeeping function of our warfighters should by now be settled practice. To the extent that there are still some people in the Army who believe otherwise, the Secretary of Defense needs to send a strong message: the U.S. has the best fighting force in the world and that force must play a vital role in recovery after the battle is won.
Now is the time to boldly advance, not retreat.